<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	 xmlns:condor="http://ns.pro.gigaom.com/feed-thumbnails/2009/09/" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is it Time For the &#8220;Web OS&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/06/is-it-time-for-the-web-os/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/06/is-it-time-for-the-web-os/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:23:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simon Mackie</title>
		<link>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/06/is-it-time-for-the-web-os/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Mackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=5432#comment-202</guid>
		<description>the iCloud service I mention in the post actually does quite a good job of working offline. As long as you have the web site opened, everything runs locally, so a lack of connectivity won&#039;t stop you, and when you get connectivity everything should sync up. However, this doesn&#039;t make up for its other shortcomings (particularly the lack of cross-browser  and device support).

Gears is obviously a great step in this direction -- but I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s being used to its fullest yet. Gmail offline works quite well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the iCloud service I mention in the post actually does quite a good job of working offline. As long as you have the web site opened, everything runs locally, so a lack of connectivity won&#8217;t stop you, and when you get connectivity everything should sync up. However, this doesn&#8217;t make up for its other shortcomings (particularly the lack of cross-browser  and device support).</p>
<p>Gears is obviously a great step in this direction &#8212; but I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s being used to its fullest yet. Gmail offline works quite well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Mackie</title>
		<link>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/06/is-it-time-for-the-web-os/comment-page-1/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Mackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=5432#comment-200</guid>
		<description>The great thing about Google&#039;s web apps is that those incremental changes can be rolled out gradually, in reaction to user needs.

You&#039;re right -- Gears is great tech to enable the hybrid &quot;OS&quot; approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The great thing about Google&#8217;s web apps is that those incremental changes can be rolled out gradually, in reaction to user needs.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right &#8212; Gears is great tech to enable the hybrid &#8220;OS&#8221; approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn Foster</title>
		<link>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/06/is-it-time-for-the-web-os/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=5432#comment-198</guid>
		<description>I agree that duplicating the entire desktop across many devices isn&#039;t the best solution. Right now, I tend to use mostly applications that allow me to synchronize data between my MacBook and my iPhone, but I&#039;ve ended up with bits of data floating around in too many applications. Google probably has one of the better solutions as Celeste mentioned above.

The key right now to a successful web os-like solution is in the offline environment. With all of my connectivity gadgets, I still find myself in places with no wireless and no cell phone access. This happened to me just last week at a local (non-tech) event. I need to be able to work offline for synchronization later when I get back to the civilized world of connectivity. An environment that provides this seamless offline desktop / online synchronization across all of my apps is the solution I would use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that duplicating the entire desktop across many devices isn&#8217;t the best solution. Right now, I tend to use mostly applications that allow me to synchronize data between my MacBook and my iPhone, but I&#8217;ve ended up with bits of data floating around in too many applications. Google probably has one of the better solutions as Celeste mentioned above.</p>
<p>The key right now to a successful web os-like solution is in the offline environment. With all of my connectivity gadgets, I still find myself in places with no wireless and no cell phone access. This happened to me just last week at a local (non-tech) event. I need to be able to work offline for synchronization later when I get back to the civilized world of connectivity. An environment that provides this seamless offline desktop / online synchronization across all of my apps is the solution I would use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celeste LeCompte</title>
		<link>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/06/is-it-time-for-the-web-os/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Celeste LeCompte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=5432#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Google seems to be moving rapidly in this hybrid direction you described, Simon. With Gears/Offline access to Google services, the expansion of the kinds of gadget you can add to your Gmail interface, and a gradual rolling out of better functionality for its Docs applications, it&#039;s a good-enough approximation for most of my needs. Mobile document editing, better tracked changes, and better image editing would give me little reason to use any other applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google seems to be moving rapidly in this hybrid direction you described, Simon. With Gears/Offline access to Google services, the expansion of the kinds of gadget you can add to your Gmail interface, and a gradual rolling out of better functionality for its Docs applications, it&#8217;s a good-enough approximation for most of my needs. Mobile document editing, better tracked changes, and better image editing would give me little reason to use any other applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>