<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	 xmlns:condor="http://ns.pro.gigaom.com/feed-thumbnails/2009/09/" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Facebook and Twitter Should Work Together</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/08/why-facebook-and-twitter-should-work-together/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/08/why-facebook-and-twitter-should-work-together/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:08:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed Gubbins</title>
		<link>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/08/why-facebook-and-twitter-should-work-together/comment-page-1/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Gubbins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=10593#comment-371</guid>
		<description>&gt;I’ll never see Facebook as the destination to make purchasing decisions

Well, I don&#039;t see my neighbor&#039;s driveway as a destination to make purchasing decisions either, but when he&#039;s out there washing his car, I go out there and chat him up, and in the process, I mention that I&#039;m in the market for a new car as well, etc. So I don&#039;t think social networks necessarily have to define themselves as e-commerce destinations. But that doesn&#039;t mean insinuating themselves into e-commerce will necessarly be easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;I’ll never see Facebook as the destination to make purchasing decisions</p>
<p>Well, I don&#8217;t see my neighbor&#8217;s driveway as a destination to make purchasing decisions either, but when he&#8217;s out there washing his car, I go out there and chat him up, and in the process, I mention that I&#8217;m in the market for a new car as well, etc. So I don&#8217;t think social networks necessarily have to define themselves as e-commerce destinations. But that doesn&#8217;t mean insinuating themselves into e-commerce will necessarly be easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin Reams</title>
		<link>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/08/why-facebook-and-twitter-should-work-together/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin Reams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=10593#comment-368</guid>
		<description>Your example of buying a TV is interesting. I think you could argue your success rate on Twitter is higher as the crowd on Twitter is more tech-oriented. Frankly, if I were to pose the question &quot;Which car should I buy&quot; on Twitter and Facebook I think I&#039;d get just as much opinion on either service.

But, that aside, I think this still ignores the most important issue: I log in to social networks to buy things. Until they shift the paradigm in our minds and usage, then I&#039;ll never see Facebook as the destination to make purchasing decisions. We go to Google and browse consumer reviews because that&#039;s what they&#039;re there for, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your example of buying a TV is interesting. I think you could argue your success rate on Twitter is higher as the crowd on Twitter is more tech-oriented. Frankly, if I were to pose the question &#8220;Which car should I buy&#8221; on Twitter and Facebook I think I&#8217;d get just as much opinion on either service.</p>
<p>But, that aside, I think this still ignores the most important issue: I log in to social networks to buy things. Until they shift the paradigm in our minds and usage, then I&#8217;ll never see Facebook as the destination to make purchasing decisions. We go to Google and browse consumer reviews because that&#8217;s what they&#8217;re there for, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
