<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	 xmlns:condor="http://ns.pro.gigaom.com/feed-thumbnails/2009/09/" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is The Antitrust Trap Getting Ready to Close Around Google?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/is-the-antitrust-trap-getting-ready-to-close-around-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/is-the-antitrust-trap-getting-ready-to-close-around-google/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:08:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: boughtit</title>
		<link>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/is-the-antitrust-trap-getting-ready-to-close-around-google/comment-page-1/#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>boughtit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=16815#comment-560</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d have to agree that the analysis is sparse, but the issue is ripe.  The comparison to Mr. Gates is especially prescient.  There are many issues that face a de facto monopoly and we are watching how failure to regulate the financial industry has brought entities &quot;too big to fail&quot; to seek bankruptcy protection.  

In the Google world, it is the engrossing of markets that concerns me.  We&#039;ll have plenty of time to wait before the Google-run net devices around our homes and businesses put us at the mercy of a single-source provider.  Nonetheless, that is where we are headed....

Google&#039;s management needs to consider the core operations as key and spin-off these subsidiaries before the DOJ and/or a shareholder&#039;s derivative action butchers the baby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to agree that the analysis is sparse, but the issue is ripe.  The comparison to Mr. Gates is especially prescient.  There are many issues that face a de facto monopoly and we are watching how failure to regulate the financial industry has brought entities &#8220;too big to fail&#8221; to seek bankruptcy protection.  </p>
<p>In the Google world, it is the engrossing of markets that concerns me.  We&#8217;ll have plenty of time to wait before the Google-run net devices around our homes and businesses put us at the mercy of a single-source provider.  Nonetheless, that is where we are headed&#8230;.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s management needs to consider the core operations as key and spin-off these subsidiaries before the DOJ and/or a shareholder&#8217;s derivative action butchers the baby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Sweeting</title>
		<link>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/is-the-antitrust-trap-getting-ready-to-close-around-google/comment-page-1/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Sweeting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=16815#comment-559</guid>
		<description>Tough crowd. For what it&#039;s worth, the piece was intended to be somewhat speculative; that&#039;s why there&#039;s a question mark in the headline. In any case, I think when you have antitrust investigators from both the FTC and DOJ sniffing around in the U.S., coupled with heightened global political awareness of Google&#039;s power and ambitions, particularly in the EU, where they have been much quicker to pull the antitrust trigger than in the U.S., that amounts to a non-trivial risk of trouble for the company. As for Brin&#039;s op-ed, like Bill Gates before him, he&#039;s doing his company no favors by trying to brush off DOJ&#039;s concerns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tough crowd. For what it&#8217;s worth, the piece was intended to be somewhat speculative; that&#8217;s why there&#8217;s a question mark in the headline. In any case, I think when you have antitrust investigators from both the FTC and DOJ sniffing around in the U.S., coupled with heightened global political awareness of Google&#8217;s power and ambitions, particularly in the EU, where they have been much quicker to pull the antitrust trigger than in the U.S., that amounts to a non-trivial risk of trouble for the company. As for Brin&#8217;s op-ed, like Bill Gates before him, he&#8217;s doing his company no favors by trying to brush off DOJ&#8217;s concerns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pgallant</title>
		<link>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/is-the-antitrust-trap-getting-ready-to-close-around-google/comment-page-1/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>pgallant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=16815#comment-558</guid>
		<description>This article is awfully weak.  It boils down to -- 

Criticism of GoogleBooks settlement + Glib op-ed by Sergey Brin =

Greater risk of DOJ antitrust lawsuit again Google 

This &quot;analysis&quot; is not worthy of GigaOm, much less GigiOm Pro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is awfully weak.  It boils down to &#8212; </p>
<p>Criticism of GoogleBooks settlement + Glib op-ed by Sergey Brin =</p>
<p>Greater risk of DOJ antitrust lawsuit again Google </p>
<p>This &#8220;analysis&#8221; is not worthy of GigaOm, much less GigiOm Pro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
