<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	 xmlns:condor="http://ns.pro.gigaom.com/feed-thumbnails/2009/09/" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Apple Should Choose Sprint Before Verizon Wireless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/why-apple-should-choose-sprint-before-verizon-wireless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/why-apple-should-choose-sprint-before-verizon-wireless/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:24:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Hawley</title>
		<link>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/why-apple-should-choose-sprint-before-verizon-wireless/comment-page-1/#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Hawley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=18937#comment-651</guid>
		<description>Sprint (Clearwire/WiMAX) would also make sense from a content perspective, since Clearwire has investment from three cable operators, and one of them (Comcast)  just launched a TV Everywhere service.   

Another reason for Apple to jump in with Sprint/Clearwire would be to pre-empt another Clearwire investor, Motorola, but MOT probably wouldn&#039;t sit idly by...

Plate tectonics lives!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sprint (Clearwire/WiMAX) would also make sense from a content perspective, since Clearwire has investment from three cable operators, and one of them (Comcast)  just launched a TV Everywhere service.   </p>
<p>Another reason for Apple to jump in with Sprint/Clearwire would be to pre-empt another Clearwire investor, Motorola, but MOT probably wouldn&#8217;t sit idly by&#8230;</p>
<p>Plate tectonics lives!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Kelley</title>
		<link>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/why-apple-should-choose-sprint-before-verizon-wireless/comment-page-1/#comment-609</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Kelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 05:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=18937#comment-609</guid>
		<description>with a QC MSM ASIC on board the iPhone will be able to do both.  Adding HSPA+ wont garner the same new market share.  Mobile devices with WiMAX will need CDMA too as they&#039;ll be roaming a good deal of the time - and as Kevin points out such devices will need to support another band (2.5-2.69) and another $25 ASIC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with a QC MSM ASIC on board the iPhone will be able to do both.  Adding HSPA+ wont garner the same new market share.  Mobile devices with WiMAX will need CDMA too as they&#8217;ll be roaming a good deal of the time &#8211; and as Kevin points out such devices will need to support another band (2.5-2.69) and another $25 ASIC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/why-apple-should-choose-sprint-before-verizon-wireless/comment-page-1/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin C. Tofel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=18937#comment-606</guid>
		<description>Good thoughts, Colin. I don&#039;t see Apple buying into the U.S. WiMAX market though. That would shackle new handsets with a wireless technology that only one of the big four carriers here is adopting. I&#039;m thinking Apple would go with an HSPA+ phone first, then migrate to LTE, but that&#039;s just my guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thoughts, Colin. I don&#8217;t see Apple buying into the U.S. WiMAX market though. That would shackle new handsets with a wireless technology that only one of the big four carriers here is adopting. I&#8217;m thinking Apple would go with an HSPA+ phone first, then migrate to LTE, but that&#8217;s just my guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
