The New Net-Neutrality Debate: What’s the Best Way to Discriminate?
- Friday, October 30, 2009
Supporters and opponents of the Federal Communications Commission's proposed net neutrality rules achieved a rare moment of agreement Thursday. Speaking at a panel discussion organized by the Washington, D.C.-based think tank Arts + Labs, Public Knowledge Legal Director Harold Feld, a strong proponent of the regulation, acknowledged that complete neutrality toward all bits on a network can never be achieved and should not be policymakers' goal. Where Feld parted company with opponents of regulation was on the question of how to decide which bits are more equal than others. That question has quickly emerged as the crux of the debate since the FCC made clear that its definition of net neutrality includes allowances for "reasonable network management."
Related Research
What Is GigaOM Pro?
GigaOM Pro is the future of technology-focused market research. We deliver expert analysis in an open conversational platform. GigaOM Pro will keep you on the inside track with the following markets:
- Mobile
- Cleantech
- Infrastructure
- Collaboration
- Digital Lifestyles
What Customers Are Saying
GigaOM Pro is “a model that delivers great value to readers. I continue to be impressed with the quality of the research and analysis, and more and more content is being added all the time as the community of contributing analysts continues to grow.”
Rob Henshaw
Founder, ValleyShadow.com
“The combination of research, analysis and discussion has become central to my job and crucial to staying informed.”
Ryan Hess
Adobe
About the Author
Paul Sweeting
in Washington, DC Latest Report
Forecast: sizing the software-defined networking market
This is one of hundreds of in-depth reports and analysis available to all GigaOM Pro subscribers.