<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:condor="http://ns.pro.gigaom.com/feed-thumbnails/2009/09/" >

<channel>
	<title>GigaOM Pro &#187; Infrastructure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pro.gigaom.com/topic/topics/infrastructure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pro.gigaom.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:00:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Microsoft Azure: Definitely Not Too Little, But is it Too Late?</title>
		<link>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/microsoft-azure-definitely-not-too-little-but-is-it-too-late/</link>
		<comments>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/microsoft-azure-definitely-not-too-little-but-is-it-too-late/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Harris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weekly Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amzn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[azure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft azure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSFT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=18487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest details on Azure paint the picture of a compelling offering, but the market won't sit idle until the pieces start materializing in 2010.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/microsoft-azure-definitely-not-too-little-but-is-it-too-late/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	 <condor:thumbnail url="http://pro.gigaom.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2009/11/Azure-logo-110x83-crop.jpg"/> 	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today in Infrastructure</title>
		<link>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/today-in-infrastructure-127/</link>
		<comments>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/today-in-infrastructure-127/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Harris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hadoop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=18543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read a post today about the need for spreadsheets adapted to handle the big-data revolution. This is a very relevant discussion, especially if the author is correct that Excel simply cannot handle entire data sets of the sizes currently being generated. IBM is trying to become the Excel of big data with Big Sheets, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/today-in-infrastructure-127/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	 <condor:thumbnail url=""/> 	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the FCC Becoming the Federal Cloud Commission?</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/11/19/is-the-fcc-becoming-the-federal-cloud-commission/</link>
		<comments>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/is-the-fcc-becoming-the-federal-cloud-commission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Harris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=18538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FCC must submit any proposed regulation through a notice-and-comment process. You can bet Google, Amazon, Microsoft and the other cloud giants will do their best to limit federal oversight of the cloud.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/is-the-fcc-becoming-the-federal-cloud-commission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	 <condor:thumbnail url=""/> 	</item>
		<item>
		<title>We Are the Big Data Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.sdtimes.com/blog/post/2009/11/19/We-are-the-big-data-problem.aspx</link>
		<comments>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/we-are-the-big-data-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Harris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hadoop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=18535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Creating algorithms to enable machine-learning on top of big data is no trivial task. Good thing Mahout is not alone: Yahoo, at least, is working on it, and IBM is working on a computer to mimic the human brain.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/we-are-the-big-data-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	 <condor:thumbnail url=""/> 	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cloud Computing: Where to Next?</title>
		<link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/enterprise/2009/11/cloud-computing-where-to-next.php?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+readwriteenterprise+%28ReadWriteEnterprise%29&#038;utm_content=Google+Reader</link>
		<comments>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/cloud-computing-where-to-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Harris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SaaS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salesforce.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=18531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been much build-up in the past couple years, and it looks like the cloud is about ready to rain. And every drop will be new capabilities that make the model even easier to embrace.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/cloud-computing-where-to-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	 <condor:thumbnail url=""/> 	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What’s After Excel? Big Data and the Future of Spreadsheets</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/11/19/whats-after-excel-big-data-and-the-future-of-spreadsheets/</link>
		<comments>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/what%e2%80%99s-after-excel-big-data-and-the-future-of-spreadsheets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Harris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hadoop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=18529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a very good question. IBM appears to have a possible solution in Big Sheets, but it seems like Microsoft should be doing everything it its power to adapt Excel to this new world.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/what%e2%80%99s-after-excel-big-data-and-the-future-of-spreadsheets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	 <condor:thumbnail url=""/> 	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review of Fujitsu’s IaaS Cloud API Submission to DMTF</title>
		<link>http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/1108</link>
		<comments>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/review-of-fujitsu%e2%80%99s-iaas-cloud-api-submission-to-dmtf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Harris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[api]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fujitsu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=18525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The progression of proposed standards through a standards body is in-the-weeds-type stuff, but this is significant because Fujitsu is stepping up its cloud involvement. The word is it has big news coming down the pike.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/review-of-fujitsu%e2%80%99s-iaas-cloud-api-submission-to-dmtf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	 <condor:thumbnail url=""/> 	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Azure Walks a Thin Blue Line</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/19/microsoft-azure-walks-a-thin-blue-line/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+OmMalik+%28GigaOM%29&#038;utm_content=Google+Reader</link>
		<comments>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/microsoft-azure-walks-a-thin-blue-line/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Harris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[azure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft azure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=18522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They say it&#8217;s impossible to be everything to everyone, but with Azure Microsoft is trying its damnedest to be just that. The early returns are promising, but we&#8217;ll know a lot more in six weeks.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/microsoft-azure-walks-a-thin-blue-line/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	 <condor:thumbnail url=""/> 	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Infrastructure Virtualization: The Next Logical Step</title>
		<link>http://vmblog.com/archive/2009/11/19/infrastructure-virtualization-the-next-logical-step.aspx</link>
		<comments>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/infrastructure-virtualization-the-next-logical-step/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Harris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal clouds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=18518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will 2010 be the year of infrastructure virtualization? It probably has to be if internal (or private) cloud adoption is to take off, but don&#8217;t expect to see that term bandied about too much.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/infrastructure-virtualization-the-next-logical-step/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	 <condor:thumbnail url=""/> 	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using Force.com for Agile and SaaS-y Results</title>
		<link>http://datacenterdialog.blogspot.com/2009/11/salesforcecom-and-ca-using-forcecom-for.html</link>
		<comments>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/using-force-com-for-agile-and-saas-y-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Harris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SaaS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salesforce.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=18516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s fitting, to see CA developing a SaaS-development app on Force.com. If companies already are comfortable with SaaS, why not help them evolve their app-dev methods in that familiar environment?
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pro.gigaom.com/2009/11/using-force-com-for-agile-and-saas-y-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	 <condor:thumbnail url=""/> 	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>